Home > Syntax Error > Ast.literal_eval Invalid Syntax

Ast.literal_eval Invalid Syntax

Contents

Do something like this instead: data = input() m, b = (int(var) for var in data.split(",")) lol in that case it instead returned m, b = (int(var) for var in data.split(",")) Here is backported patch with additional test. Please refer to our Privacy Policy or Contact Us for more details You seem to have CSS turned off. How can I stun or hold the whole party? http://netlookmag.com/syntax-error/invalid-syntax-python-for-no-reason.html

Good luck on serverfault.com where this question is headed ... You then have to resync to some point beyond the error in order to continue parsing. The idea is that literal_eval` only works on literals—numbers, strings, lists, etc., while eval works on any Python expression. –abarnert Jan 4 '13 at 9:32 1 @abarnert No worries, I'm type, expr?

Ast.literal_eval Invalid Syntax

Plus and Times, Ones and Nines How to decrypt .lock files from ransomeware on Windows Add a language to a polyglot Why does Davy Jones not want his heart around him? Note that child nodes of nodes that have a custom visitor method won't be visited unless the visitor calls generic_visit() or visits them itself. Changing them will break code and tests that depend on the exact wording. 2.7 does not get enhancements. (Specific reason) In 2.x, the input to (literal-)eval is either latin-1 encoded bytes This makes the code impossible to evaluate, so if evaluation is wanted annotate_fields must be set to False.

For this a special visitor exists (NodeTransformer) that allows modifications. class ast.NodeTransformer¶ A NodeVisitor subclass that walks the abstract syntax tree and allows modification of nodes. Your code is already handling conversion to integers for the numbers. >>> input('') - Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "", line 1 - ^ If responding by email, please delete the rest. Abstract Syntax Tree All possible attributes must be present and have valid values when compiling an AST with compile().

The result will be a tree of objects whose classes all inherit from ast.AST. Browse other questions tagged python dictionary or ask your own question. Please don't fill out this field. Generated parsers tend to spit out a simplistic "expected $(TOKEN_TYPE) here" message, which isn't always useful to the user.

The string or node provided may only consist of the following Python literal structures: strings, numbers, tuples, lists, dicts, booleans, and None. Python Eval The actual node classes are derived from the Parser/Python.asdl file, which is reproduced below. other than that, provide some more information –Samuele Mattiuzzo Jan 4 '13 at 9:17 2 Why are you using eval in the first place? X++ is not a valid Python expression is good enough .

Ast.literal_eval Example

For some calls, there's no error at all and it works just fine. When writing code to interpret the grammar rules explicitly (as opposed to using a parser-generator), it's easy to detect errors, because the next token doesn't fit the production rule. Ast.literal_eval Invalid Syntax you can try like this: >>> a='192.156.1.0,8181,database,admin,12345' >>> a = str(map(str,a.split(','))) >>> a "['192.156.1.0', '8181', 'database', 'admin', '12345']" >>> ast.literal_eval(a) ['192.156.1.0', '8181', 'database', 'admin', '12345'] your code will look like this: Python Ast.literal_eval Malformed String This class is meant to be subclassed, with the subclass adding visitor methods.

Administration User List Committer List Help Tracker Documentation Tracker Development Report Tracker Problem Issue22221 classification Title: ast.literal_eval confused by coding declarations Type: behavior Stage: resolved Components: Interpreter Core Versions: Python 2.7 this contact form Did millions of illegal immigrants vote in the 2016 USA election? Is there a performance difference in the 2 temp table initializations? value) -- need sequences for compare to distinguish between -- x < 4 < 3 and (x < 4) < 3 | Compare(expr left, cmpop* ops, expr* comparators) | Call(expr func, Python Compile Function

SyntaxError: unexpected EOF while parsing in Python 3 - Stack Overflow View More at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18495581/syntaxerror-unexpecte... Navigation index modules | next | previous | Python » 2.7.13 Documentation » The Python Standard Library » 32. In [1]: import ast In [2]: ast.literal_eval('foo') --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ValueError Traceback (most recent call last) in () ----> 1 ast.literal_eval('foo') /usr/lib/python2.7/ast.pyc in literal_eval(node_or_string) 78 return left - right 79 raise ValueError('malformed have a peek here Apart from the node classes, ast module defines these utility functions and classes for traversing abstract syntax trees: ast.parse(source, filename='', mode='exec')¶ Parse the source into an AST node.

Add a language to a polyglot Unable to understand the details of step-down voltage regulator TV episode or movie where people on planet only live a hundred days and fall asleep Python Exec For example, to create and populate an ast.UnaryOp node, you could use node = ast.UnaryOp() node.op = ast.USub() node.operand = ast.Num() node.operand.n = 5 node.operand.lineno = 0 node.operand.col_offset = 0 This is useful to "move code" to a different location in a file.

eval() input() in Python 2 is the equivalent of eval(input()) in Python 3, and if you need to use raw_input() in Python 2 then in Python 3 you need to remove

SyntaxError: unexpected EOF while parsing So the issue as presented is the special-case message. Connect to Services Connect to personal services for more relevant search results across services. kwargs) | Repr(expr value) | Num(object n) -- a number as a PyObject. | Str(string s) -- need to specify raw, unicode, etc? -- other literals? Python String To Dict Is an internal HDD with Ubuntu automatically bootable from an external USB case?

ast.get_docstring(node, clean=True)¶ Return the docstring of the given node (which must be a FunctionDef, ClassDef or Module node), or None if it has no docstring. Both take "data" as their argument, not a variable name, so they aren't really testing the variable so much as what the variable expands to. There is one class defined for each left-hand side symbol in the abstract grammar (for example, ast.stmt or ast.expr). Check This Out If you want to understand how to do this, you need to understand the theory (oops, there's that compiler book again) of how the parsers are constructed. (I have implemented this

Reedy (terry.reedy) * Date: 2014-08-22 22:48 [When responding, please do not quote more than a line or two. Created using Sphinx 1.3.3.